Why the study?
It was hypothesized that post-saline infusion test and post-captopril test plasma aldosterone concentrations indicate the severity of aldosterone-producing adenoma and might predict clinical outcome after adrenalectomy.
Does post-SIT PAC predict clinical success better than post-CT PAC in patients undergoing adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism?
Does post-SIT PAC predict clinical success better than post-CT PAC in patients undergoing adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism?
Post-seated saline infusion test plasma aldosterone concentration is a strong predictor of clinical success (cure or improvement of hypertension) following adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism, outperforming the captopril test.
Post-SIT PAC may aid outcome prediction after adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding practice.
OBJECTIVE: The saline infusion test (SIT) and the captopril test (CT) are widely used as confirmatory tests for primary aldosteronism (PA). We hypothesized that post-SIT and post-CT plasma aldosterone concentrations (PAC) indicate the severity of aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and might predict clinical outcome. METHODS: We recruited 216 patients with APA in the Taiwan Primary Aldosteronism Investigation (TAIPAI) registry who received both seated SIT and CT as confirmatory tests. The data of 143 patients who underwent adrenalectomy with complete follow-up after diagnosis were included in the final analysis. We determined the proportion of patients achieving clinical success in accordance with the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome consensus. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify preoperative factors associated with cure of hypertension. RESULTS: Complete clinical success was achieved in 48 (33.6%) patients and partial clinical success in 59 (41.2%) patients; absent clinical success was seen in 36 (25.2%) of 143 patients. Post-SIT PAC but not post-CT PAC was independently associated with clinical outcome. Higher levels of post-SIT PAC had a higher likelihood of clinical benefit (complete plus partial clinical success; odds ratio = 1.04 per ng/dl increase, 95% confidence interval = 1.01, 1.06; P = 0.004). Patients with post-SIT PAC > 25 ng/dl were more likely to have a favorable clinical outcome after adrenalectomy. This cutoff value translated into a positive predictive value of 86.0%. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that post-SIT PAC is a better predictor than post-CT PAC for clinical success in PA post adrenalectomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: