March 31, 2017Magnetic Resonance in MedicineOpen Access

Three‐dimensional quantification of vorticity and helicity from 3D cine PC‐MRI using finite‐element interpolations

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Population

Phantom models, computational fluid dynamics simulations, 18 healthy volunteers, and 3 patients

Comparison

3D finite-element method for quantification of… vs Analytical solutions and other current…

Design

Other

Authors

JSJulio SoteloFederico Santa María Technical University JUJesús UrbinaClínica Alemana IVIsrael ValverdeUniversity of Toronto

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Improves noninvasive profiling of complex 3D hemodynamics without relying on 2D planes.

Structured PICO

Population

Phantom models, computational fluid dynamics simulations, 18 healthy volunteers, and 3 patients

Intervention

3D finite-element method for quantification of vorticity and helicity density from 3D cine PC-MRI

Comparator

Analytical solutions (combined Poiseuille and Lamb-Ossen equation) and other current approaches via computational fluid dynamics

Outcome

Accuracy of 3D vorticity and helicity density estimationsurrogate

A novel 3D finite-element method improves the accuracy of quantifying entire 3D vorticity and helicity density maps from 3D cine PC-MRI without relying on reformatted 2D planes.

Cite This Study

Sotelo et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a85103e18016805cd0cc731 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26687

Topics

Cardiac MRI

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Three‐dimensional quantification of vorticity and helicity from 3D cine PC‐MRI using finite‐element interpolations

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Topics

Three‐dimensional quantification of vorticity and helicity from 3D cine PC‐MRI using finite‐element interpolations

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Topics

Also Consider