Why the study?
Does the Thakar score accurately predict the incidence of postoperative acute renal failure requiring dialysis in an external cohort of cardiac surgery patients?
Does the Thakar score accurately predict the incidence of postoperative acute renal failure requiring dialysis in an external cohort of cardiac surgery patients?
The Thakar score can qualitatively identify cardiac surgery patients at higher risk for postoperative ARF requiring dialysis, but it lacks sufficient precision to estimate the true incidence in external cohorts.
Thakar score may qualitatively stratify ARF-D risk but lacks precision externally; leaves open its routine use without local recalibration.
OBJECTIVE: Preoperative assessment of risk factors for postoperative acute renal failure (ARF) is a key point in the management of cardiac surgery patients. A reliable evaluation of individual risk permits the efficient application of prophylactic and therapeutic measures to patients with increased risk of ARF. In 2005, Thakar published a scoring system to determine the ARF risk prior to surgery. The score allowed calculation of the incidence of postoperative ARF requiring dialysis (ARF-D) with a high level of precision. METHODS: In order to examine the reproducibility of the results on different patient populations, we retrospectively applied the scoring system to 3,508 cardiac surgery patients at the Goettingen University Hospital. RESULTS: We found a qualitative correlation between the score value and ARF-D, but prognostic significance, when judged by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, was considerably reduced. Also, the incidence of ARF-D in the Goettingen population was remarkably higher than the incidence shown by Thakar for patients with the same score. CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between score values and incidence of ARF-D shows that the Thakar score is qualitatively transferable to cardiac surgery patients from other centres. Though the score allows the discrimination between patients with higher or lower risks of ARF-D within the Goettingen collective, it was not suitable to estimate the real incidence of postoperative ARF-D with sufficient precision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heise et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: