Why the study?
Does low preoperative von Willebrand factor activity increase operative blood loss in pediatric scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion?
Does low preoperative von Willebrand factor activity increase operative blood loss in pediatric scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion?
Pediatric scoliosis patients with VWF: RCo levels ≤60% carry a significantly higher risk of operative bleeding per level fused during posterior spinal fusion.
Low VWF:RCo ≤60% was associated with higher blood loss in pediatric scoliosis fusion; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Purpose: Patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD), typically have von Willebrand Ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF: RCo) levels ≤30%. Patients with marginal levels 30-70 % don’t receive replacement therapy unless there is a bleeding history. Our program screens for VWF: RCo activity in advance of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery. We hypothesized all patients with levels <70% are at higher bleeding risk when undergoing scoliosis repair. Design: this is a retrospective review of prospectively gathered data from a dedicated patient blood management program database. Methods: 169 scoliosis patients with preoperative VWF: RCo >70% were initially matched to 59 patients with activity ≤70%. Stratification was done at VWF: RCo levels >70 %, 61-70%, 51-60% and ≤50%, to examine blood loss. Matching was done by scoliosis type (idiopathic, neuromuscular, others), and operative difficulty. Both logistic regression and multivariate regression were used to examine the various levels. Results: Patients with VWF: RCo >70 % compared to those with ≤70% had similar demographics, blood loss, and transfusion rates. On stratification, blood loss/segment fused with VWF: RCo levels <50% was significant compared to other levels; 51-60%, 61-70% or >70%, p = 0.044. Multivariate regression revealed compared to other levels, those patients with VWF: RCo levels ≤60 % were most likely to have higher blood loss even on controlling for potential confounders (p < 0.005). Sixteen patients with levels <50% had significant bleeding despite factor replacement in 15. Conclusion: Layered multivariate analysis showed that patients with VWF: RCo levels ≤ 60% carried higher risk of operative bleeding/ level fused. Prospective therapeutic studies are much needed.Purpose: Patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD), typically have von Willebrand Ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF: RCo) levels ≤30%. Patients with marginal levels 30-70 % don’t receive replacement therapy unless there is a bleeding history. Our program screens for VWF: RCo activity in advance of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery. We hypothesized all patients with levels <70% are at higher bleeding risk when undergoing scoliosis repair. Design: this is a retrospective review of prospectively gathered data from a dedicated patient blood management program database. Methods: 169 scoliosis patients with preoperative VWF: RCo >70% were initially matched to 59 patients with activity ≤70%. Stratification was done at VWF: RCo levels >70 %, 61-70%, 51-60% and ≤50%, to examine blood loss. Matching was done by scoliosis type (idiopathic, neuromuscular, others), and operative difficulty. Both logistic regression and multivariate regression were used to examine the various levels. Results: Patients with VWF: RCo >70 % compared to those with ≤70% had similar demographics, blood loss, and transfusion rates. On stratification, blood loss/segment fused with VWF: RCo levels <50% was significant compared to other levels; 51-60%, 61-70% or >70%, p = 0.044. Multivariate regression revealed compared to other levels, those patients with VWF: RCo levels ≤60 % were most likely to have higher blood loss even on controlling for potential confounders (p < 0.005). Sixteen patients with levels <50% had significant bleeding despite factor replacement in 15. Conclusion: Layered multivariate analysis showed that patients with VWF: RCo levels ≤ 60% carried higher risk of operative bleeding/ level fused. Prospective therapeutic studies are much needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nabil Hassan (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: