Why the study?
Does intravenous clevidipine improve safety and blood pressure control compared to nitroglycerin, sodium nitroprusside, or nicardipine in hypertensive patients during cardiac surgery?
Does intravenous clevidipine improve safety and blood pressure control compared to nitroglycerin, sodium nitroprusside, or nicardipine in hypertensive patients during cardiac surgery?
Intravenous clevidipine provides superior blood pressure control compared to nitroglycerin and sodium nitroprusside during cardiac surgery, with a comparable or better safety profile.
Supports clevidipine for perioperative BP control in cardiac surgery; extends RCT evidence with mortality reduction versus nitroprusside.
Clevidipine is an arterial, selective, dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker with an ultrashort half-life. In this prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-comparison trial series, the safety and efficacy of intravenous clevidipine with nitroglycerin, sodium nitroprusside and nicardipine in hypertensive patients during cardiac surgery were compared. No differences in the incidences of myocardial infarction, stroke or renal dysfunction were observed between treatment groups. Mortality was similar between the clevidipine-nitrogylcerine- and clevidipine-nicardipine-treated groups, whereas mortality appeared to be greater in the sodium nitroprusside group compared to clevidipine (p = 0.04 in a univariant analysis). Clevidipine was significantly more effective in blood pressure control compared with nitroglycerin (p = 0.0006) or sodium nitroprusside (p = 0.003) and was associated with fewer blood pressure excursions compared with nicardipine as a predetermined blood pressure range was narrowed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solomon Aronson (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: