Why the study?
Does elevated serum GABA contribute to hypotension in patients with compensated cirrhosis?
Does elevated serum GABA contribute to hypotension in patients with compensated cirrhosis?
Elevated serum GABA levels in patients with compensated cirrhosis may contribute to the hypotension observed in this population, as supported by the vasodilatory effects of GABA infusion in a dog model.
Supports GABA contribution to hypotension in compensated cirrhosis; leaves open causal confirmation and therapeutic targeting.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were recorded in 176 ambulant patients with chronic liver disease, including 36 patients with compensated cirrhosis (Group I), 119 patients with noncirrhotic chronic liver disease (Group II) and 21 patients with benign structural or functional liver disease (Group III). Group I patients had significantly lower systolic (113.0 +/- 2.2 mm Hg, mean +/- S.E.) and diastolic (65.3 +/- 1.7 mm Hg) pressures than Group II patients (125.8 +/- 3.5 and 76.6 +/- 1.5 mm Hg, respectively (p less than 0.0001) or Group III patients (125.1 +/- 3.4 and 77.5 +/- 2.4 mm Hg, respectively) (p less than 0.0001). Serum levels of GABA, a potent amino acid neurotransmitter with known vasodilatory effects in vitro, were higher in Group I patients (1.12 +/- 0.26 microM, mean +/- S.E.) than in Group II patients (0.41 +/- 0.05 microM) (p less than 0.005) or Group III patients (0.34 +/- 0.03 mM) (p less than 0.05). A constant infusion of GABA into the systemic circulation of six adult dogs, at rates required to achieve serum GABA levels within one order of magnitude of those observed in humans with cirrhosis, resulted in a 17.0 +/- 4.3 mm Hg decrease in systolic pressure (p less than 0.05) and a 10.8 +/- 3.7 mm Hg decrease in diastolic pressure (p less than 0.05). Control amino acids were not vasoactive. The results of this study suggest that, in addition to other vasoactive compounds, a GABA-mediated process might contribute to the hypotension observed in patients with compensated cirrhosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Minuk et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: