Why the study?
Does automated air tonometry accurately measure P(r)co(2) under hypothermia compared to normothermia in an in vitro cardio-pulmonary bypass model?
Does automated air tonometry accurately measure P(r)co(2) under hypothermia compared to normothermia in an in vitro cardio-pulmonary bypass model?
Automated air tonometry (TONOCAP) measurements of P(r)co(2) under hypothermia represent a pH-stat approach, requiring identical blood gas management for calculating mucosal-arterial CO(2) differences.
Hypothermic tonometry aligns with pH-stat analysis for CO2 gap calculations; leaves open clinical validity pending human studies.
Intestinal tonometry is used during hypothermic cardio-pulmonary bypass surgery to assess splanchnic perfusion. In an in vitro set-up the performance of automated air tonometry (TONOCAP) was tested for normo- and hypothermia. A 14-FG tonometry catheter was built into a testing chamber (100 cm(3)) perfused with blood from a cardio-pulmonary bypass circuit with P(a)co(2) held at 5.6-5.8 kPa (alpha-stat). P(r)co(2) from the balloon of the tonometry catheter was measured at intervals of 10 min at 37 degrees C and at 25 degrees C by the TONOCAP. Bias (precision) of P(r)co(2) - P(a)co(2 alpha-stat) and P(r)co(2) -P(a)co(2 pH-stat) at 37 degrees C blood temperature were low at 0.23 kPa (0.21) each. Tonometrically measured P(r)co(2) at 25 degrees C significantly differed from P(a)co(2 alpha-stat) bias (precision) of 2.00 kPa (0.11) but was similar to P(a)co(2 pH-stat) (0.30 kPa (0.11)). P(r)co(2) values as measured by the TONOCAP represent pH-stat approach. Identical blood gas management (pH- or alpha-stat) should be used for calculation of mucosal-arterial CO(2) difference (P(r-a)co(2) gap) or calculation of intramucosal pH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dullenkopf et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: