Why the study?
Does enoxaparin reduce costs compared to standard heparin for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective hip surgery?
Does enoxaparin reduce costs compared to standard heparin for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective hip surgery?
Despite higher drug costs, enoxaparin is expected to be cost-saving compared to standard heparin for DVT prophylaxis in elective hip surgery.
Enoxaparin may yield net cost savings for DVT prophylaxis in elective hip surgery; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication in patients undergoing elective hip surgery. Because of the associated risk of pulmonary embolism, prophylaxis with standard (unfractionated) heparin is becoming increasingly important. Recent clinical trials have shown a low molecular weight form of heparin, enoxaparin, to be more effective than standard heparin in preventing DVT, but the new drug is also more expensive. Data on clinical effectiveness and cost were combined in an economic evaluation of the two regimens. It was found that prophylaxis with enoxaparin would be expected to lead to a net saving of 20 pounds per patient. The economic results are sensitive to the costs of enoxaparin, the costs of drug administration and the probability of false clinical diagnosis of DVT or pulmonary embolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drummond et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: