Why the study?
Does dual ETA/ETB-receptor blockade alter coronary hemodynamics and O2 metabolism during exercise in dogs?
Does dual ETA/ETB-receptor blockade alter coronary hemodynamics and O2 metabolism during exercise in dogs?
Dual ETA/ETB-receptor blockade alters coronary hemodynamics and O2 metabolism during exercise in dogs, but this effect appears dependent on beta-adrenergic activity.
Dual ETA/ETB blockade may alter exercise coronary O2 metabolism via beta-adrenergic pathways in dogs; leaves open human translation.
We hypothesized that endothelin (ET) release during exercise may be triggered by alpha-adrenergic-receptor activation and thereby influence coronary hemodynamics and O(2) metabolism in dogs. Exercise resulted in coronary blood flow increases (to 1.88+/-0.26 from 1.10+/- 0.12 ml x min(-1) x g(-1)) and in a fall (P<0.01) in coronary sinus O(2) saturation (17.4+/-1.5 to 9.6+/-0.7 vol%), whereas myocardial O(2) consumption (MVO(2)) increased (109+/-13% from 145+/-16 microl O(2) min(-1) x g(-1)). Tezosentan, a dual ET(A)/ET(B)-receptor blocker, slightly reduced mean arterial pressure (MAP) and increased heart rate throughout exercise. The relationship between coronary sinus O(2) saturation and MVO(2) was shifted upward (P<0.05) after tezosentan administration; i.e., as MVO(2) increased during exercise, coronary sinus O(2) saturation was disproportionately higher after ET-receptor blockade. After propranolol, tezosentan resulted in significant decreases (P<0.05) in left ventricular pressure, the first derivative of left ventricular pressure over time, and MAP during exercise. As MVO(2) increased during exercise, coronary sinus O(2) saturation levels after tezosentan became superimposable over those observed before ET-receptor blockade. Thus dual blockade of ET(A)/ET(B) receptors alters coronary hemodynamics and O(2) metabolism during exercise, but ET activity failed to increase beyond baseline levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takamura et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: