If one is an egalitarian, what should one want to equalize? Opportunities or outcomes? Resources or welfare? These positions are usually conceived to be very different. I argue in this paper that the distinction is misconceived: the only coherent conception of resource equality implies welfare equality, in an appropriately abstract description of the problem. In this section, I motivate the program which the rest of the paper carries out.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John E. Roemer (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: