Key result
DIGIT-HF trial enrolled higher-risk HFrEF patients with ~66% in NYHA class III.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to present the baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in DIGIT-HF and compare them with participants from recent HFrEF trials.
RCT (n=1,212)
double-blind
randomized
Yes
Enrolls sicker HFrEF patients than recent trials; extends digitoxin testing to advanced disease but leaves generalizability open.
AIMS: This report presents the baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the DIGIT-HF trial and compares them with participants from recent trials with improved outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: DIGIT-HF, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial enrolling patients with symptomatic HFrEF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class II and left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤30%, or NYHA class III-IV and LVEF ≤40%), compares the efficacy and safety of digitoxin versus placebo in addition to standard treatment. Most baseline characteristics of the intention-to-treat population (1212 patients, mean age 66 ± 11 years, 20% women, mean LVEF 29 ± 7%) were similar to those in recent HFrEF trials. The distribution of NYHA class II, III, and IV was 30%, 66% and 4%, respectively, and indicates that the patients were sicker than in comparator HFrEF trials. Less patients had atrial fibrillation (27%) than those in recent HFrEF trials, but prescription rates of background therapy with beta-blockers (96%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (95%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (76%), and diuretics (87%) were high and similar. Overall, 40% of patients were on angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, 19% on sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and 9% on ivabradine. Rates of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD, 64%) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT, 25%) devices were much higher than in recent HFrEF trials. CONCLUSIONS: Patients included in DIGIT-HF display a more severe HF symptom burden and higher rates of ICD/CRT implants compared to participants in recent HFrEF trials, while pharmacotherapy was largely similar. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT (2013-005326-38).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bavendiek et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in symptomatic HFrEF (n=1,212). digitoxin vs. placebo was evaluated. Patients enrolled in the DIGIT-HF trial had a severe heart failure symptom burden (66% NYHA class III) and high rates of ICD (64%) and CRT (25%) implants compared to recent HFrEF trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: