Why the study?
Does digitoxin plus guideline-directed medical therapy reduce the composite of death from any cause or hospital admission for worsening heart failure in patients with advanced chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction?
Does digitoxin plus guideline-directed medical therapy reduce the composite of death from any cause or hospital admission for worsening heart failure in patients with advanced chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction?
While digitoxin initially improves outcomes in advanced HFrEF, the reconvergence of survival curves at 36 months raises questions about its long-term efficacy.
To the Editor: The DIGIT-HF (Digitoxin to Improve Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Chronic Heart Failure) trial, conducted by Bavendiek et al. (Sept. 25 issue), 1 showed the superiority of digitoxin plus guideline-directed medical therapy over placebo plus guideline-directed medical therapy for the primary outcome (composite of death from any cause or hospital admission for worsening heart failure). However, the primary-outcome curves for the digitoxin and placebo groups reconverged, which suggests that the benefit observed at a median follow-up of 36 months may not be sustained. 2 Does prolonged therapy with digitoxin result in neutral or detrimental effects? In addition, subgroup analyses . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bavendiek et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: