Why the study?
Does pre-ablation MDCT localization of the fossa ovalis facilitate transseptal puncture in patients undergoing left atrial ablation?
Does pre-ablation MDCT localization of the fossa ovalis facilitate transseptal puncture in patients undergoing left atrial ablation?
Pre-procedural MDCT imaging to localize the fossa ovalis is a feasible and helpful tool for guiding transseptal puncture during left atrial ablation.
MDCT fossa ovalis localization supported transseptal puncture in this small series; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before wider adoption.
AIMS: Transseptal puncture (TP) can be a difficult procedure and is not without risk of complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of three-dimensional multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) to localize the fossa ovalis (FO) and facilitate TP in patients undergoing left atrial catheter ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fourteen consecutive patients were studied. Thirteen patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation and one patient had ablation for left atrial flutter. All patients underwent cardiac MDCT imaging pre-ablation for use in conjunction with electroanatomic mapping. Prior to puncturing the interatrial septum, standard fluoroscopic views of the transseptal sheath were compared with corresponding MDCT images tagging the FO. Successful, uncomplicated TP was achieved in all 14 patients. The mean duration of TP was 15.6 +/- 10.0 min. The average fluoroscopy time was 8.5 +/- 7.4 min. The MDCT images were deemed helpful in facilitating TP in 13 patients (93%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of MDCT to localize the FO and aid TP. For patients undergoing left atrial ablation in whom MDCT imaging is undertaken pre-ablation, tagging the FO can be easily performed and is a novel tool for guiding transseptal catheterization without additional risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graham et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: