Key result
3D map-guided transseptal puncture achieves ~97% success with zero puncture-related complications during left-sided ablation.
Why the study?
Transseptal puncture for left-sided catheter ablation is routinely performed under fluoroscopy or echocardiography, despite 3D mapping systems being readily available in electrophysiology laboratories.
Does 3D map-guided transseptal puncture improve feasibility and safety in patients undergoing left-sided catheter ablation?
Cohort (n=104)
No
Does 3D map-guided transseptal puncture improve feasibility and safety in patients undergoing left-sided catheter ablation?
A 3D map-guided transseptal puncture approach is highly feasible, safe, and allows for zero-fluoroscopy transseptal access during left-sided catheter ablation procedures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support zero-fluoroscopy transseptal access; leaves open whether randomized trials confirm advantages over standard techniques.
AIMS: Transseptal puncture (TP) for left-sided catheter ablation procedures is routinely performed under fluoroscopic or echocardiographic guidance [transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)], although three-dimensional (3D) mapping systems are readily available in most electrophysiology laboratories. Here, we sought to assess the feasibility and safety of a right atrial (RA) 3D map-guided TP. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 104 patients, 3D RA mapping was performed to identify the fossa ovalis (FO) using the protrusion technique. The radiofrequency transseptal needle was visualized and navigated to the desired potential FO-TP site. Thereafter, the interventionalist was unblinded to TEE and the potential FO-TP site was reassessed regarding its convenience and safety. After TP, the exact TP site was documented using a 17-segment-FO model. Reliable identification of the FO was feasible in 102 patients (98%). In these, 114 3D map-guided TP attempts were performed, of which 96 (84%) patients demonstrated a good position and 18 (16%) an adequate position after TEE unblinding. An out-of-FO or dangerous position did not occur. A successful 3D map-guided TP was performed in 110 attempts (97%). Four attempts (3%) with adequate positions were aborted in order to seek a more convenient TP site. The median time from RA mapping until the end of the TP process was 13 (12-17) min. No TP-related complications occurred. Ninety-eight TP sites (85.1%) were in the central portion or in the inner loop of the FO. CONCLUSION: A 3D map-guided TP is feasible and safe. It may assist to decrease radiation exposure and the need for TEE/ICE during left-sided catheter ablation procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bohnen et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=104). 3D map-guided transseptal puncture was evaluated on Successful 3D map-guided transseptal puncture (97% success rate). A 3D map-guided transseptal puncture resulted in a 97% success rate with no puncture-related complications during left-sided catheter ablation procedures.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: