Key result
Non-fluoroscopic 3D mapping matches fluoroscopy for transseptal puncture success while reducing radiation exposure.
Why the study?
Transseptal puncture is commonly performed under fluoroscopic guidance, exposing patients and healthcare professionals to harmful ionizing radiation, motivating evaluation of a non-fluoroscopic technique using 3D mapping.
Cohort (n=34)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May reduce radiation exposure in transseptal puncture; leaves open confirmation in prospective randomized trials.
Background Transseptal puncture (TSP) is commonly performed under fluoroscopic guidance in left atrial ablation procedures. This exposes patients and healthcare professionals to deleterious ionizing radiation. We describe a novel technique for performing TSP non‐fluoroscopically using a three‐dimensional (3D) mapping system only. The safety and efficacy of this technique is compared to traditional fluoroscopy guided TSP. Methods Retrospective, single‐center study of patients undergoing TSP for left atrial ablation. Those undergoing TSP using 3D mapping system alone (nonfluoroscopy group) were compared to those undergoing fluoroscopic guided TSP (Fluoroscopy group). Clinical, procedural data and complications were analyzed from a prospective registry. Results Twenty patients (32 TSPs) in the nonfluoroscopy (NF) group were compared to 14 patients (25 TSPs) in fluoroscopy (F) group. TSP success rates were similar across the groups (88% vs 96% in the NF and F groups, P = 0.97). In the NF group, there was one cardiac tamponade, two unsuccessful TSPs (previous cardiac surgery—required TOE guided TSP), and one patient required fluoroscopy on a background of CRTD device to avoid lead displacement. The mean fluoroscopy time and dose were significantly lower in the nonfluoroscopy group (0.75 ± 0.50 vs 5.32 ± 3.23 min, P < 0.001; 92.5 ± 60.7 vs 394.3 ± 182.7 cGy/cm2, P < 0.001). Conclusion Our study shows that TSPs can be performed safely and effectively using this non‐fluoroscopic novel technique in a select group of patients. Radiation exposure is reduced significantly without compromising patient safety. Larger studies are required to substantiate these results. Patients with cardiac implantable devices and previous cardiac surgery may pose a challenge to using this technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sawhney et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Left atrial ablation requiring transseptal puncture (n=34). Non-fluoroscopic 3D mapping-guided transseptal puncture vs. Traditional fluoroscopy guided transseptal puncture was evaluated on Transseptal puncture success rate (p=0.97). Non-fluoroscopic 3D mapping-guided transseptal puncture achieved a similar success rate to traditional fluoroscopic guidance (88% vs 96%, P=0.97) while significantly reducing fluoroscopy time and dose.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: