Why the study?
Does fluoroscopy-guided transseptal puncture without routine advanced imaging provide a safe approach for left atrial access during ablation of left-sided arrhythmias?
Does fluoroscopy-guided transseptal puncture without routine advanced imaging provide a safe approach for left atrial access during ablation of left-sided arrhythmias?
Transseptal puncture can be safely performed under fluoroscopy and pressure monitoring without the routine use of additional imaging techniques like ICE or TEE, with a low overall complication rate.
Supports fluoroscopy-guided transseptal puncture without routine advanced imaging as a safe approach;.
AIMS: The transseptal approach is used for left atrial access during the ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and other left-sided arrhythmia substrates. Transseptal puncture (TP) is commonly performed with fluoroscopic guidance, contrast injection, and pressure monitoring. In many centres, additional techniques [intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE), radiofrequency needle] are used to facilitate TP but its use adds costs. In this retrospective study, we studied the safety and complication rate when TP was routinely done with fluoroscopic guidance, contrast injection, and pressure monitoring using ICE or TEE only in selected cases. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study analysed 4690 consecutive TP performed between 2000 and 2015: 3408 (72.6%) were ablation of AF, left-sided atrial flutter, or left-sided atrial tachycardia (non-AP group); 1153 (24.6%) were ablation of left-sided accessory pathway, AP group; and 129 (2.8%) were ablation of ventricular tachycardia. Transseptal puncture was done under fluoroscopy, pressure monitoring, and commonly using contrast media injection. In 27 procedures, ICE or TEE was used to guide the TP. We found 34 tamponades (Tx) that required pericardial drainage of which 28 (0.59%) could possibly be TP related and six could not. The total complication rate for all Tx was 0.72%. A higher rate of tamponades was observed in the AF (non-AP) group than in the AP group (0.88 vs. 0.17%, P < 0.02). The highest rate of tamponades was registered during the operators 51-100 cases, 1.3%, and decreased to 0.4% in cases 101-200, P = 0.04. CONCLUSION: TP can safely be done under fluoroscopy and pressure monitoring without routine use of additional techniques. With experience, operators should be able to further decrease complication rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matoshvili et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: