Why the study?
It was unknown whether the patient rhythm during cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation affects acute biophysical parameters.
Does patient rhythm (atrial fibrillation vs sinus rhythm) impact acute biophysical parameters during cryoballoon ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF?
Does patient rhythm (atrial fibrillation vs sinus rhythm) impact acute biophysical parameters during cryoballoon ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF?
Patient baseline rhythm (sinus rhythm vs atrial fibrillation) does not impact acute balloon biophysical parameters during second-generation cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal AF.
Rhythm at cryoballoon application does not affect acute biophysical parameters in paroxysmal AF; leaves open effects on lesion durability or outcomes.
Background: Pulmonary vein isolation by means of cryoballoon is a well-established way of treatment of atrial fibrillation. The aim of the study was to compare the acute cryoballoon biophysical parameters attained during energy applications to the individual pulmonary vein during sinus rhythm versus atrial fibrillation. Methods: 100 Patients who underwent their first-time PVI using second-generation cryoballoon for symptomatic and drug-refractory AF, between the beginning of March to end of August 2016, were initially screened. 61 patients with paroxysmal AF were included in the present study. 39 patients with persistent AF were excluded. No pre-procedural anatomical imaging was reported. Results: A total of 61 patients (male 80%, age 59.3 ± 13.4 years) were included in the present analysis. A total of 243 pulmonary veins were isolated with an average of 1.87 ± 1.14 cryo energy applications per individual vein. During cryo application, there were no significant differences between applications delivered during sinus rhythm or ongoing AF in the rate of temperature drop at 5 and 30 s, rate of warming at 5 s after freezing stop or achieved balloon nadir temperature. The same also was observed for both the balloon cooling rate and warming times. Conclusions: The present analysis shows no impact of the patient baseline rhythm at the time of energy application upon the acute balloon biophysical parameters in patients with normal sinus rhythm and those with ongoing atrial fibrillation using the second-generation cryoballoon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanhoury et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: