Why the study?
Does erythropoietin reduce myocardial infarct size in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Does erythropoietin reduce myocardial infarct size in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
High-dose erythropoietin administered as an adjunct to primary PCI in STEMI patients does not reduce infarct size and is associated with increased microvascular obstruction and adverse left ventricular remodeling.
High-dose EPO does not reduce infarct size in STEMI; discourages adjunctive use and closes this therapeutic avenue for cardioprotection.
OBJECTIVE: The acute administration of high-dose erythropoietin (EPO) on reperfusing ischaemic myocardium has been reported to halve myocardial infarct (MI) size in preclinical studies, but its effect in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains unknown. We investigated whether high-dose EPO administered as an adjunct to PPCI reduces MI size. DESIGN: Double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled. SETTING: Single tertiary cardiac centre. PATIENTS: Fifty-one ST elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing PPCI. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a single intravenous bolus of EPO (50,000 IU) prior to PPCI with a further bolus given 24 h later (n=26) or placebo (n=25). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: MI size measured by 24 h area under the curve troponin T and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging performed on day 2 and at 4 months. RESULTS: EPO treatment failed to reduce MI size (troponin T area under the curve: 114.6±78 μg/ml EPO vs 100.8±68 μg/ml placebo; infarct mass by cardiac magnetic resonance: 33±16 g EPO vs 25±16 g placebo; both p>0.05). Unexpectedly, EPO treatment doubled the incidence of microvascular obstruction (82% EPO vs 47% placebo; p=0.02) and significantly increased indexed left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volumes (84±10 ml/m(2) EPO vs 73±13 ml/m(2) placebo; p=0.003), indexed LV end-systolic volumes (41±9 ml/m(2) EPO vs 35±11 ml/m(2) placebo; p=0.035) and indexed myocardial mass (89±16 g/m(2) EPO vs 79±11 g/m(2) placebo; p=0.03). At 4 months, there were no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose EPO administered as an adjunct to PPCI failed to reduce MI size. In fact, EPO treatment was associated with an increased incidence of microvascular obstruction, LV dilatation and increased LV mass. Clinical Trial Registration Information http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/search/StudyDetail.aspx?StudyID=4058 Unique Identifier=Study ID 4058.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ludman et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: