Why the study?
Does the co-application of ischemic preconditioning and postconditioning improve systolic function in human myocardium subjected to simulated ischemia/reperfusion injury?
Does the co-application of ischemic preconditioning and postconditioning improve systolic function in human myocardium subjected to simulated ischemia/reperfusion injury?
In human right atrial trabeculae, the co-application of ischemic preconditioning and postconditioning abolishes the cardioprotective effects seen when either intervention is applied alone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Co-application of IPC and POC warrants caution in cardioprotection strategies; leaves open optimal protocols for intact human myocardium.
BACKGROUND: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and postconditioning (POC) are well documented to trigger cardioprotection against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, but the effect oftheir both co-application remains unclear in human heart. The present study sought to assessthe co-application of IPC and POC on fragments of human myocardium in vitro. METHODS: Muscular trabeculae of the human right atrial were electrically driven in the organbath and subjected to simulated I/R injury - hypoxia/re-oxygenation injury in vitro. To achieveIPC of trabeculae the single brief hypoxia period preceded the applied lethal hypoxia, and to achieve POC triple brief hypoxia periods followed the lethal hypoxia. Additional muscular trabeculae were exposed only to the hypoxic stimulation (Control) or were subjected to the non-hypoxic stimulation (Sham). 10 μM norepinephrine (NE) application ended every experiment to assess viability of trabeculae. The contraction force of the myocardium assessed as a maximal amplitude of systolic peak (%Amax) was obtained during the whole experiment's period. RESULTS: Co-application of IPC and POC resulted in decrease in %Amax during the re-oxygentaionperiod and after NE application, as compared to Control (30.35 ± 2.25 vs. 41.89 ± 2.25, 56.26 ± 7.73 vs. 65.98 ± 5.39, respectively). This was in contrary to the effects observed when IPC and POC were applied separately. CONCLUSIONS: The co-application of IPC and POC abolishes the cardioprotection of either intervention alone against simulated I/R injury in fragments of the human right heart atria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roleder et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: