Why the study?
Recent data regarding the impact of cardiorespiratory fitness on cardiometabolic risk were lacking specifically for Central and Eastern Europe.
Is higher estimated cardiorespiratory fitness associated with a lower prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors in Czech adults?
Is higher estimated cardiorespiratory fitness associated with a lower prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors in Czech adults?
Higher cardiorespiratory fitness estimated by a non-exercise equation is strongly associated with lower odds of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia in Czech adults.
May aid cardiometabolic risk stratification; hypothesis-generating for prospective trials in Czech adults.
Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a strong independent predictor of morbidity and mortality. However, there is no recent information about the impact of CRF on cardiometabolic risk specifically in Central and Eastern Europe, which are characterized by different biological and social determinants of health. In this cross-sectional study normative CRF values were proposed and the association between CRF and cardiometabolic outcomes was evaluated in an adult Czechian population. In 2054 participants (54.6% females), median age 48 (IQR 19 years), the CRF was predicted from a non-exercise equation. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regressions were carried out to determine the associations. Higher CRF quartiles were associated with lower prevalence of hypertension, type 2 diabetes (T2D) and dyslipidemia. Comparing subjects within the lowest CRF, we see that those within the highest CRF had decreased chances of hypertension (odds ratio (OR) = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.22-0.60); T2D (OR = 0.16; 0.05-0.47), low HDL-c (OR = 0.32; 0.17-0.60), high low-density lipoprotein (OR = 0.33; 0.21-0.53), high triglycerides (OR = 0.13; 0.07-0.81), and high cholesterol (OR = 0.44; 0.29-0.69). There was an inverse association between CRF and cardiometabolic outcomes, supporting the adoption of a non-exercise method to estimate CRF of the Czech population. Therefore, more accurate cardiometabolic studies can be performed incorporating the valuable CRF metric.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neto et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: