Why the study?
Studies on self-care behaviours in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are mainly cross-sectional, leaving longitudinal trends of self-care behaviour changes poorly understood.
Patients with COPD who have poor medical resources and medical insurance are at high risk for poor self-care behaviors, highlighting the need for individualized interventions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Distinct COPD self-care trajectories identified via LCGA; hypothesis-generating for COM-B predictors, prospective trials needed before practice change.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the trajectories of self-care behaviours in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on the latent class growth model and investigate the predictors of each trajectory based on the capability opportunity motivation and behaviour model. BACKGROUND: Studies on self-care behaviours of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are mainly cross-sectional surveys. However, little is known about longitudinal trends of self-care behaviours changes among those population. DESIGN: This was a prospective observational research performed according to STROBE Checklist. METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were followed up at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Data collection included the scores of self-care behaviours, specific demographic and clinical characteristics, and scores for the predictors. A latent class growth model was used to explore the self-care behaviours trajectories. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of self-care behaviours trajectories. RESULTS: Three trajectories in the self-care behaviours of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were found: a persistently negative trajectory, a maintenance trajectory after a slight increase and an active trajectory with a slow upward improvement in self-care behaviours. Medical insurance and access to medical resources were the predictors of self-care behaviours. CONCLUSION: The patients with poor medical resources and medical insurance are at high risk for the poor self-care behaviours and the negative trajectory. Thus, dynamic and individualised intervention should be continuously provided to ensure patients acquire adequate medical resources to comprehensively improve self-care behaviours. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: People with better self-care trajectory may be patients who receive more medical resources or have less financial burden, which will help with the early identification of high-risk patients with a negative self-care trajectory. Intervention guided by Behaviour Change Wheel Theory should be conducted dynamically for patients for patients with different trajectories. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Thank the patients and their families for their cooperation in data collecting in this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dou et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: