Why the study?
Does the CoaguChek XS portable INR monitor provide accurate INR measurements compared to laboratory methods in patients on warfarin home monitoring?
Does the CoaguChek XS portable INR monitor provide accurate INR measurements compared to laboratory methods in patients on warfarin home monitoring?
The CoaguChek XS portable INR monitor provides highly accurate INR measurements comparable to standard laboratory testing, supporting its clinical utility for warfarin home monitoring.
May support CoaguChek XS for warfarin home monitoring; leaves open need for prospective outcome trials before practice change.
AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of the CoaguChek XS international normalised ratio (INR) monitor compared with the laboratory method. METHODS: The accuracy and ease of use of the recently marketed CoaguChek XS portable INR monitor was evaluated in 17 patients involved in a trial of warfarin home monitoring. INR results from the monitor were compared with those from the laboratory method. Clinical applicability was measured by discrepant INR values, defined in the literature by expanded and narrow agreement criteria, and by the proportion of INR values differing by >15% and by >20% from those derived by the laboratory method. RESULTS: Participants provided 59 comparison INR measurements for analysis. The paired results were highly correlated (r = 0.91). Expanded and narrow agreement between paired INR values occurred 100% of the time. Only three CoaguChek XS (5.1%) results differed by >15% compared with the laboratory method; no results differed by >20% or were discrepant by >0.5 INR units. CONCLUSIONS: In the hands of patients the CoaguChek XS showed good correlation with laboratory determination of INR and compared well with expanded and narrow clinical agreement criteria. Both patients and doctors were highly satisfied with the accuracy and ease of use of the CoaguChek XS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bereznicki et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: