Key result
No clinical data is available as the provided text only contains the journal's editorial board information.
Why the study?
Does INR self-monitoring with the CoaguChek XS portable device provide accurate and clinically agreeable measurements compared to standard laboratory practice in unexperienced patients on long-term anticoagulation?
Population
41 patients on long-term anticoagulation with acenocumarol without previous experience in self-monitoring…
Comparison
INR self-monitoring with the CoaguChek XS… vs Standard laboratory practice for INR measurement
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
No study data available; leaves open whether CoaguChek XS self-monitoring matches lab INR in anticoagulation patients.
Does INR self-monitoring with the CoaguChek XS portable device provide accurate and clinically agreeable measurements compared to standard laboratory practice in unexperienced patients on long-term anticoagulation?
Self-management with the CoaguChek XS portable device is clinically safe, reliable, and highly accurate compared to standard laboratory practice in inexperienced patients on long-term anticoagulation.
Fernández et al. (2009) studied this question. CoaguChek XS portable device vs. standard laboratory practice was evaluated. No clinical data is available as the provided text only contains the journal's editorial board information.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: