Why the study?
Does enalapril infusion improve hemodynamic parameters in dogs with acute or chronic left ventricular failure?
Does enalapril infusion improve hemodynamic parameters in dogs with acute or chronic left ventricular failure?
Enalapril acts as an arterial vasodilator and improves cardiac output in dogs with chronic, but not acute, left ventricular failure.
Enalapril effects may differ by failure chronicity in dogs; leaves open human translation and requires clinical validation.
Enalapril (MK-421) is a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor which effectively lowers elevated blood pressure and might also be useful in heart failure. Enalapril was infused into six awake dogs 2 hours after left circumflex coronary artery embolization (acute failure group) and into six other awake dogs two to six months after coronary embolization (chronic failure group). In the acute failure group 2 hours after embolization, increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and reduced cardiac output remained unchanged during enalapril infusion. In the chronic failure group, increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure also remained unchanged during enalapril infusion, but cardiac output, which had fallen to 131.8 +/- 11.9 (S.D.) from 165.8 +/- 17.9 ml/min/kg (P less than 0.01) by two to six months in this group rose during enalapril infusion to 154.5 +/- 27.7 ml/min/kg (P less than 0.05). Heart rate and blood pressure were not changed during enalapril in either group, but stroke volume rose (26.0 +/- 5.9 to 29.2 +/- 6.9 ml, P less than 0.01) and systemic vascular resistance fell (58.5 +/- 10.3 to 39.3 +/- 4.3 units, P less than 0.01) during enalapril only in the chronic failure group. Plasma renin activity after embolization was slightly but not significantly higher in the acute failure group. Thus, enalapril appears to be an arterial vasodilator in dogs with chronic but not acute left ventricular failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leddy et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: