Why the study?
Does maximal potential PFO diameter correlate with the type or frequency of neurologic events prior to closure in patients undergoing transcatheter PFO closure?
Does maximal potential PFO diameter correlate with the type or frequency of neurologic events prior to closure in patients undergoing transcatheter PFO closure?
Maximal potential PFO diameter measured by balloon sizing does not correlate with the type or frequency of neurologic events prior to PFO closure.
MPPD should not yet guide PFO closure decisions by event type; leaves open whether size predicts neurologic risk.
BACKGROUND: We analyzed our data on patients undergoing transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure to determine if the maximal potential PFO diameter (MPPD) by balloon sizing correlates with important clinical characteristics in this population. METHODS: We defined stroke as a focal neurologic deficit lasting >24 h, or focal deficit of shorter duration associated with permanent MRI/CT changes consistent with a focal infarction. Parameters analyzed included age, gender, anticoagulation, hypertension, smoking, MRI/CT findings and MPPD at catheterization. We specifically analyzed the type of neurologic event (stroke/transient ischemic attack, TIA), and number of recorded preceding clinical neurologic events. RESULTS: In 216 consecutive patients, 167 suffered a stroke. MRI/CT changes consistent with one or more embolic events were seen in 156 patients; 49 had a clinical TIA. There was no significant difference in MPPD between stroke (11.0 +/- 3.6 mm) and TIA groups (10.9 +/- 3.9 mm; 95% confidence interval for difference: -1.33 to 1.00). MPPD did not differ between MRI/CT-positive vs. -negative strokes, and had no correlation with the number of identified pre-closure clinical neurologic events. CONCLUSIONS: Continued investigation is needed to determine whether other PFO characteristics, or other anatomic/physiologic parameters, may be useful to identify patients at high risk for cryptogenic stroke/TIA, even before they have their first neurologic event.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kutty et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: