The study defines the dynamic in vivo design parameters of the normal aortic valve, which may inform the design and longevity of bioprosthetic valves.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Animal-derived parameters may inform bioprosthetic valve design; leaves open human translation and durability testing.
The design parameters of the natural aortic valve in vivo were not known, which may explain why various bioprosthetic valves have been designed differently. The design of the aortic valve was studied in vivo by placing radiopaque markers in the valve. The marker movement revealed that, during a cardiac cycle, the design parameters of the valve were changing continuously with changing aortic pressure and ventricular geometry. During diastole decreasing radius of the commissures (Rc) and increasing radius of the bases (Rb) caused the leaflets to tilt toward the ventricle, thereby decreasing the bottom surface angle (alpha) and increasing the free-edge angle (phi) of the leaflet. During systole Rc increased, Rb decreased, and interleaflet distance decreased, causing a change in the geometry of the open valve from conical to cylindrical. In middiastole the design parameters were Rb/Rc = 1.2, H/Rc = 1.4, phi = 34 degrees, and alpha = 20 degrees, where H is sinus height. How a significant deviation from the design could compromise the efficiency and longevity of the valve is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piepgrass et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: