Comparative study reveals enhanced individual learning and distinct spatial engagement in a metaverse platform, indicating that proximity-based affordances bolster collaborative inquiry.
Spatial virtual environments enable proximity-based communication and continuous awareness of others’ locations, potentially reshaping how learners coordinate collaborative inquiry. This study compared a spatial metaverse environment with a functionally comparable web-based system during a collaborative physics inquiry activity with simulations. We analyzed activity performance, individual learning performance, interest in science learning, system operation logs, and spatial traces. After controlling for pretest scores, students in the metaverse environment showed higher individual learning performance, whereas activity performance did not differ between conditions. System logs suggested different patterns of engagement across environments. Guided by affordance theory, spatial trace analysis identified three patterns of perceived spatial affordance: shared visual orientation, cross-group interaction, and peer awareness. These patterns indicate that students utilized visibility, proximity, and movement to enhance shared attention, cross-group interaction, and awareness of peers’ activities during collaborative inquiry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: