What question did this study set out to answer?

To evaluate the adequacy of traditional legal models regarding abuse of power in public administration and assess how psychological, organizational, and technological factors can inform preventive governance.

August 19, 2026Cogent Social SciencesOpen Access

Evaluating abuse of power in administrative decision-making: a psychological and technological analysis of public administration

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

BKBahaaeddin M. S. KhwairaUniversity of Lusaka AHAmine Ben Hadj HassineUniversity of Lusaka JAJehad Dhifallah Al-JaziYarmouk University

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Legal-doctrinal analysis reveals abuse of power stems from cumulative decision-making failures in public administration, suggesting integrated preventive oversight enhances administrative legality.

Key Points

To evaluate the adequacy of traditional legal models regarding abuse of power in public administration and assess how psychological, organizational, and technological factors can inform preventive governance.
Conducted a legal-doctrinal analysis integrating legal statutes and judicial decisions with management science principles.
Evaluated public administration models alongside psychological, organizational, and digital transformation factors that influence administrative deviations.
Demonstrated that abuse of power is a cumulative procedural and human failure within organizational decision-making rather than solely a post-hoc legal defect.
Proposed an integrated preventive oversight framework combining judicial review with proactive administrative tools and digital mechanisms to improve transparency and trust.

Cite This Study

Khwaira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a85638803308d306e2d6be6 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2719271

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Legal-doctrinal analysis reveals abuse of power stems from cumulative decision-making failures in public administration, suggesting integrated preventive oversight enhances administrative legality.

Evaluating abuse of power in administrative decision-making: a psychological and technological analysis of public administration

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Evaluating abuse of power in administrative decision-making: a psychological and technological analysis of public administration

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider