Formal verification study demonstrates deterministic correction propagation in finite typed-graph models, indicating consistent downstream obligation tracking for distributed knowledge systems.
BIT-CSKC-EOS-CS-001 defines a provider-neutral, version-bound calculus for correction propagation and receipt-limited scoped settlement in the Cognitive Sovereignty and Knowledge Commons (CSKC) stack. It governs how corrections, withdrawals, stale-use stops, successor states and downstream obligations are represented after a knowledge object, disclosure or decision has entered circulation. The R1 research core is closed at F5. Its closure basis comprises F0–F4 analytic results, a 24-case propagation benchmark, a 48-case finite policy kernel, and exhaustive agreement over 1,062,882 states in the locked finite projection, with 0 checker disagreement and 41/41 closure checks passing. The supported claim is narrow: selected provider-neutral, version-bound downstream correction obligations and scoped-settlement rules hold within the declared finite typed-graph model. The record does not establish global propagation or erasure, exact machine unlearning, novelty or patentability, legal compliance, privacy, security or fairness assurance, field validation, production readiness, exhaustive coverage of reality, or Lean machine verification. Lean candidate material has been prepared, but exact compilation and dependency audit have not been run. External independent review remains open. EOS-CS does not replace BIT-CVC-ITL-EOS-001. AIDC, KPLR and FGR remain frozen upstream dependencies. Lineage does not transfer authority. Record status: PRECANONICAL RESEARCH CORE · CLOSED AT F5Verdict: ACCEPT_EOSCS_R1_CLOSED_AT_F5Authority emitted: 0 Release artifact SHA-256:44828634f128d8bbbe6f15786dbc44c81f102c34d5059448ad8411c489daff3b Author: Bùi Quang TrịnhCosmic Emissary · Global Thinker · Chief ArchitectFounder of Boundary Information Theory (BIT)Independent Researcher · Hà Nội, Việt Nam AI-assistance disclosure: AI systems assisted research synthesis, adversarial checking, bounded test orchestration, drafting and document preparation under human direction. Research scope, theorem selection, claim boundaries, publication decisions and responsibility remain with the author.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quang Trịnh Bùi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: