Comparative benchmark demonstrates that restricted Boltzmann machines outperform tractable models on binarized image data, highlighting the expressive cost of exact inference.
Generative probabilistic models differ in a fundamental way that is rarely measured directly: some permit exact inference, while others are more expressive but require their likelihood to be estimated. This study compares three model families on binarized Fashion-MNIST and MNIST under identical preprocessing, identical data splits, and matched parameter counts, evaluating every model by test log-likelihood on a common scale. Sum-product networks and mixtures of Bernoullis return exact likelihoods; the likelihood of a restricted Boltzmann machine is obtained by annealed importance sampling and reported with the effective sample size of the importance weights and a convergence study. Three results follow. First, the structure of a sum-product network matters more than its size: changing only which pixels are assigned to which leaf region, at a fixed parameter count of 706,800, is worth 38.7 nats on Fashion-MNIST and 41.2 nats on MNIST, whereas multiplying the capacity of a flat mixture eightfold yields approximately 13 nats. A network whose regions are misaligned with the data performs worse than a model with no hierarchy at all. Second, once the regions are aligned, the benefit of hierarchy depends on the data: the network exceeds the best flat mixture by 17.2 nats on Fashion-MNIST but falls 2.0 nats short on MNIST, where whole-image prototypes already suffice. Third, the restricted Boltzmann machine outperforms every tractable model tested at matched capacity, leading the best of them by 11.4 nats on Fashion-MNIST and 46.1 nats on MNIST, which quantifies the cost of guaranteeing exact inference. Exact inference nonetheless carries a practical benefit: for image completion, the sum-product network computes conditional marginals exactly and improves on max-product in every configuration tested. Training a fully connected Boltzmann machine to convergence proved infeasible on the available hardware, and the computational limitations are reported quantitatively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: