Key result
Artificial intelligence-based fat attenuation index (AI-FAI) demonstrated strong correlation (ρ=0.877, p<0.001) and high agreement with traditional workstation-FAI across multiple CT scanners.
Why the study?
To evaluate the feasibility and generalizability of an AI-based automated method for measuring the pericoronary fat attenuation index and promote efficient clinical translation.
Does an AI-based automated method for measuring pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI) provide comparable performance to traditional workstation measurement in patients undergoing coronary CTA?
Observational (n=1,125)
Yes
Does an AI-based automated method for measuring pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI) provide comparable performance to traditional workstation measurement in patients undergoing coronary CTA?
An AI-based automated method for measuring pericoronary fat attenuation index provides a reliable and robust alternative to traditional workstation measurements across multiple CT scanners.
Supports AI feasibility for pericoronary FAI measurement; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Objectives To evaluate the feasibility and generalizability of an AI-based automated method for measuring the pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI)—a promising non-invasive imaging biomarker for coronary inflammation—and to promote efficient clinical translation. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on coronary computed tomography angiography data from 1,125 patients (584 [51.9%] male; mean age 61.5 ± 12.3 years; totaling 3,375 coronary arteries) examined using five mainstream CT scanners from different manufacturers, models, and generations. FAI values around the major coronary arteries were quantitatively evaluated using both AI software and workstation. Agreement between methods, diagnostic performance, and scanner influence were assessed. Results Artificial intelligence-based fat attenuation index (AI-FAI) demonstrated a favorable correlation with workstation-FAI at the patient level (ρ = 0.877, p < 0.001; n = 1,125), along with a high level of agreement (mean bias: 1.60 HU; 95% limits of agreement: -4.94 to 8.14; 94.84% within limits). Using a threshold of -70.1 HU, AI-FAI demonstrated performance comparable to workstation-FAI, with accuracy (84.98%) and solid diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.851). Furthermore, AI-FAI exhibited stable measurement performance across all five scanners, with inter-scanner ρ ranging from 0.829 to 0.896 and only 3.70–6.06% of outliers beyond the agreement limits. Conclusions AI-FAI demonstrates favorable agreement with traditional workstation-FAI, solid diagnostic performance, and consistent cross-scanner robustness, providing a reliable automated tool for cardiovascular risk assessment. Advances in knowledge This is a novel study demonstrating AI-FAI as a practical alternative to workstation-FAI across multiple CT scanners, facilitating reliable quantification of coronary inflammation for routine clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiu et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary inflammation (n=1,125). Artificial intelligence-based fat attenuation index (AI-FAI) vs. Workstation-FAI was evaluated on Agreement between AI-FAI and workstation-FAI at the patient level (ρ = 0.877, 95% CI -4.94 to 8.14, p=<0.001). Artificial intelligence-based fat attenuation index (AI-FAI) demonstrated strong correlation (ρ=0.877, p<0.001) and high agreement with traditional workstation-FAI across multiple CT scanners.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: