Key result
Highest gut microbiota dietary index linked to ~31% lower odds of circadian syndrome.
Why the study?
The relationship between the dietary index for gut microbiota, a proxy for gut-microbiota-related dietary patterns, and circadian syndrome remains unclear.
Is a higher dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) score associated with a lower prevalence of circadian syndrome in U.S. adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=18,491)
Is a higher dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) score associated with a lower prevalence of circadian syndrome in U.S. adults?
Higher adherence to a gut microbiota-supportive diet is associated with a lower prevalence of circadian syndrome in U.S. adults.
Higher DI-GM may link to lower CircS odds; leaves open whether microbiota-targeted diets modify circadian-metabolic risk.
Circadian Syndrome (CircS) is an epidemiologic construct that combines metabolic abnormalities with features related to sleep and mood and has been associated with adverse health outcomes. The dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) is a dietary proxy index reflecting adherence to dietary patterns potentially related to gut microbial composition, but its relationship with CircS remains unclear. A total of 18,491 adults from NHANES 2007–2018 were analyzed using survey-weighted logistic regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS) modeling, subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analysis. Associations between individual DI-GM components and CircS were further evaluated. Nine machine-learning algorithms were used to assess classification performance and model interpretability based on area under the curve, calibration, decision-curve analysis, and Shapley additive explanations. Mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate whether body mass index (BMI) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) may partly account for the observed association. Higher DI-GM scores were inversely associated with CircS. Participants in the highest quartile had lower odds than those in the lowest (OR = 0.693, 95% CI 0.603–0.797; P for trend < 0.001). RCS analysis suggested an overall inverse association, with no strong evidence of nonlinearity (P overall < 0.001; P nonlinearity = 0.130). Subgroup analyses indicated possible variation by poverty-income ratio, ethnicity, and education. Several DI-GM components differed by CircS status. Machine-learning models showed moderate classification performance, and the incremental contribution of DI-GM was limited. Mediation analyses suggested that BMI, and to a lesser extent SII, may partly account for the association between DI-GM and CircS. Among U.S. adults in NHANES 2007–2018, higher DI-GM scores were inversely associated with CircS. Further longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the temporal relationship between dietary patterns represented by DI-GM and CircS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Circadian Syndrome (n=18,491). Dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) vs. Lowest quartile of DI-GM (Q1) was evaluated on Circadian Syndrome (CircS) (OR 0.693, 95% CI 0.603-0.797, p=<0.001). Participants in the highest quartile of the dietary index for gut microbiota had significantly lower odds of circadian syndrome compared to those in the lowest quartile (OR 0.693).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: