Survey study reveals that low public awareness and socio-contextual factors impede AI adoption pathways, highlighting risks of persistent digital exclusion across demographic groups.
From healthcare to education, commerce to the workplace, today AI offers significant gains. Yet the realisation of these gains may not be equally distributed. Previous research into digital exclusion demonstrates how some societal groups are less able to leverage the benefits of technology, and already data is revealing socially stratified differences in people's perceptions and attitudes towards AI. Relatedly, due to the often-opaque integration of AI into everyday technologies, public awareness of AI is low, and evidence would suggest this too is a factor likely to be impacted by issues of digital exclusion. Given that we know perception drives technology adoption but do not yet know the impact of awareness in this trajectory, it is imperative we empirically measure these relationships from the perspective of societal inequities. Using data collected via two public surveys ( N = 305, 303), this paper extends the Technology Acceptance Model using a novel measure of awareness to better understand pathways to AI adoption. Our estimates are consistent with: (1) AI adoption pathways being largely similar to other technologies; (2) a lack of AI awareness impeding pathways to AI adoption; and (3) socio-contextual factors driving differences in awareness of AI. Ensuring all people in society can and do successfully adopt AI technologies requires modelling its unique properties and examining how these properties themselves may be subject to societal inequities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bentley et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: