Why the study?
Heart failure DMPs can improve outcomes and reduce costs, but programs in Austria are heterogeneous regarding intervention type.
This survey highlights the heterogeneity of existing heart failure disease management programs in Austria and emphasizes the need for a standardized, nationwide approach.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant standardized HF DMPs in Austria; leaves open optimal components for outcome trials.
Heart failure (HF) is common and is associated with high morbidity, mortality and high health expenditure. A multidisciplinary disease management plan (DMP) can reduce morbidity and mortality, save costs and improve the quality of life. In Austria, three HF-specific DMPs are currently in a project phase and four established DMPs are active. Although programs are widely heterogeneous with respect to their intervention type, they pursue the same interventional goal by supporting seamless care between inpatient and community care settings with a multidisciplinary team. This survey presents a systematic survey of the HF-specific DMPs in Austria. Disparities between programs are highlighted and discussed. The nationwide establishment of HF-specific DMPs that integrate primary care and cardiology services including a regulation of the remuneration of stakeholders and program infrastructure is needed to decrease the burden of HF for both the individual and society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poelzl et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: