Key result
Addition of vildagliptin to low-dose metformin did not significantly improve flow-mediated dilation compared to high-dose metformin over 12 weeks (mean difference 0.08%, p=0.854).
Why the study?
Does vildagliptin added to low-dose metformin improve endothelial function and metabolic parameters compared to high-dose metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes?
RCT (n=97)
Open-label
Pocock and Simon’s minimization method
Yes
Does vildagliptin added to low-dose metformin improve endothelial function and metabolic parameters compared to high-dose metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Mean Difference: 0.08 (95% CI -0.74–0.89)
Absolute Event Rate: -0.51% vs -0.58%
p-value: p=0.854
In patients with type 2 diabetes, adding vildagliptin to low-dose metformin improves glycemic control and adiponectin levels but does not improve endothelial function compared to titrating to high-dose metformin.
BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors may have protective effects in the early stage of atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes, although similar effects in advanced atherosclerosis were not shown in recent randomized placebo-controlled studies. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitor on endothelial function and glycemic metabolism compared with high-dose metformin. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-labeled, prospective, randomized, parallel-group comparison study, patients with type 2 diabetes treated with low-dose metformin (500-750 mg/day) were enrolled and randomly assigned to a vildagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, add-on group (Vilda) or a double dose of metformin group (high Met) for 12 weeks. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and serum metabolic markers were assessed before and after treatment. In addition, glycemic control and metabolic parameters were also assessed. RESULTS: ; HbA1c, 7.3 ± 0.5%; FMD, 5.8 ± 2.6%) were enrolled. Eight subjects dropped out by the end of the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics. After 12 weeks, HbA1c was significantly improved in the Vilda group compared with the high Met group (- 0.80 ± 0.38% vs. - 0.40 ± 0.47%, respectively; p < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in FMD (- 0.51 [- 1.08-0.06]% vs. - 0.58 [- 1.20-0.04]%). Although the apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 ratio was significantly reduced in the Vilda group compared with baseline (0.66-0.62; p < 0.01), the change did not differ significantly between the two groups (- 0.04 vs. 0.00; p = 0.27). Adiponectin levels were significantly increased in the Vilda group compared with the high Met group (0.75 μg/mL vs. 0.01 μg/mL; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of glycemic improvement, combination therapy of vildagliptin and metformin did not affect endothelial function but may exert favorable effects on adipokine levels and lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes without advanced atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitao et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes (n=97). Vildagliptin vs. High-dose metformin (1000-1500 mg/day) was evaluated on Change in flow-mediated dilation (FMD) (MD 0.08, 95% CI -0.74 to 0.89, p=0.854). Addition of vildagliptin to low-dose metformin did not significantly improve flow-mediated dilation compared to high-dose metformin over 12 weeks (mean difference 0.08%, p=0.854).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: