Why the study?
SGLT2 inhibitors reduce cardiovascular events and heart failure in T2D patients with high cardiovascular risk, whereas DPP-4 inhibitors showed neutral effects and may increase heart failure risk.
Does dapagliflozin improve cardiometabolic parameters compared to vildagliptin in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease?
Does dapagliflozin improve cardiometabolic parameters compared to vildagliptin in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease?
Dapagliflozin provides more favorable extraglycemic cardiometabolic effects, including reductions in BMI, systolic blood pressure, and hs-TnT, compared to vildagliptin in patients with T2D and CAD.
Dapagliflozin improves cardiometabolic parameters over vildagliptin in T2D-CAD; extends RCT evidence favoring SGLT2i in this population.
AIMS: Sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce cardiovascular events and heart failure in type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients with high cardiovascular risk. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors showed neutral effects and may increase risk of heart failure. We aimed to compare cardiometabolic effects of dapagliflozin and vildagliptin in T2D patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Forty-nine T2D patients with CAD were randomly assigned to dapagliflozin (n = 25) or vildagliptin (n = 24) for 6 months in a double-blind fashion. Cardiometabolic parameters were collected at baseline and at the end of treatments. RESULTS: significantly decreased in both dapaglifozin and vildagliptin groups (0.6 ± 1.0% vs 0.8 ± 1.4%, P = 0.22, respectively). There was no difference between the changes in lipid profiles. Body mass index decreased in patients receiving dapagliflozin, whereas it increased in those receiving vildagliptin (-1.27 [95% confidence interval -2.01, -0.53] vs 1.72 [0.72, 2.72] kg, P < 0.001). The reduction in systolic blood pressure and high-sensitivity troponin T was observed in the dapagliflozin group (-9.87 [-18.00, -1.15] mmHg and 2.49 [-4.50, -0.47] pg/mL) but not in vildagliptin group (-1.97 [-9.42, 5.48] mmHg and 1.98 [-0.02, 3.97] pg/mL). The mean haemoglobin increased in the dapagliflozin group, whereas the mean platelet volume increased in the vildagliptin group. There was no significant change in the inflammatory markers in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The extraglycaemic effects of dapagliflozin and vildagliptin on cardiometabolic parameters in T2D with CAD were different. The more favourable effects of dapagliflozin compared to vildagliptin may have explained the cardiovascular benefits observed only in sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phrommintikul et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: