Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The L protein of Theiler's virus inhibits the generation of H-2K-restricted virus-specific cytotoxicity in the CNS, allowing persistent infection and subsequent demyelination in susceptible mouse strains.
In susceptible mouse strains, the wild-type Daniel's (wt-DA) strain of Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus induces a persistent central nervous system (CNS) infection with chronic demyelination. The virus is cleared from resistant mice with no resulting demyelination. We characterized the role of the DA L* protein in late demyelination and persistent infection. The DA genome has two alternative reading frames, encoding the virus polyprotein and L*, respectively. The mutant virus DAL*-1 fails to synthesize L* and does not persist in the CNS of wt-DA-susceptible SJL/J or B10.S mice. Since class I-restricted cytotoxicity has been shown to determine resistance to virus persistence and demyelination in this model, virus-specific cytotoxicity in the CNS of DA-resistant (B6 or B10) and -susceptible (SJL/J and B10.S) mice during the acute stage of DA and DAL*-1 infection was characterized. Following intracerebral inoculation with DAL*-1, virus-specific Db- and Kb-restricted CTLs were demonstrated in the CNS of resistant B10 mice, whereas only Db-restricted CTL were found in wt-DA-inoculated mice. CTLs specific to wt-DA or DAL*-1 recognized class I-presented peptides from either of the viruses. Of particular interest, Ks-restricted virus-specific cytotoxicity-restricted CTLs were identified in the CNS of susceptible SJL/J (H-2s) and B10.S (H-2s) mice inoculated with DAL*-1. In contrast, no virus-specific CTLs were identified in the CNS of SJL/J and B10.S mice inoculated with wt-DA. We propose that L* inhibits the generation of H-2K-restricted virus-specific cytotoxicity in the CNS, permitting a persistent infection in susceptible strains, with subsequent inflammatory demyelination in the CNS similar to that in human multiple sclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: