Why the study?
Does the presence of diabetes affect the prescription rates of evidence-based medications after acute myocardial infarction?
Does the presence of diabetes affect the prescription rates of evidence-based medications after acute myocardial infarction?
Patients with diabetes are significantly less likely to receive evidence-based secondary prevention therapies such as aspirin, beta-blockers, and streptokinase after an acute myocardial infarction compared to those without diabetes.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies examining the management of patients with diabetes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been based on clinical studies under experimental conditions. We used data from a population-based heart disease register to document differences in the management after AMI between patients with and without diabetes. HYPOTHESIS: There were no differences in the prescription rates of aspirin, beta blockers, streptokinase, ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers between patients with and without diabetes admitted to hospital with AMI. METHODS: A retrospective study of 268 patients with, and 1714 patients without, diabetes discharged from hospital with 'definite' AMI between August 1988 and March 1994. RESULTS: The prescription rates of all five drug classes increased between 1988 and 1994 both for patients with and without diabetes. Patients with diabetes were significantly less likely to have been prescribed aspirin (76% vs 85%), beta blockers (41% vs 53%) and streptokinase (25% vs 43%) but more likely to have been prescribed ACE inhibitors (47% vs 29%) and calcium channel blockers (50% vs 40%). The differences in prescription rates were statistically significant after controlling for age, sex, history of ischaemic heart disease, smoking status, educational level and disease severity. CONCLUSION: Patients with diabetes were less likely to have been prescribed three of the five drug classes where evidence points to a beneficial effect after AMI. Further work is needed to identify the reasons for the disparity between management of patients with and without diabetes, and to develop effective strategies to increase the implementation of best practice guidelines in the management of patients with diabetes after AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: