Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Because of their high electrical resistivity and high magnetic permeability, nickel–zinc ferrites are among the best soft magnetic materials for high-frequency applications. In this work, a precursor of nanostructured (Ni0.5Zn0.5)Fe2O4 was obtained by a sol–gel method modified for large quantity production. Six heat-treated samples were produced by calcining the precursor for 3 h at 450, 500, 600, 650, 700, and 1100 °C, respectively. X-ray diffraction peak width data have been used to estimate the particle sizes of the calcined samples. Room-temperature and low-temperature Fe57 Mössbauer effect experiments allowed us to determine whether the heat-treated nanoparticles are crystalline or amorphous, whether there is a superparamagnetic phase, and which calcining temperature is optimum for obtaining a large magnetic hyperfine field and a homogeneous magnetic phase. Room-temperature Mössbauer spectra revealed that the precursor is paramagnetic, while the heat-treated samples have the ferrimagnetic phase. The samples heat treated at a calcining temperature of 650 °C or higher showed no residual paramagnetic phase, indicating that 650 °C is the threshold calcining temperature for homogeneous (Ni0.5Zn0.5)Fe2O4 nanoparticles. A comparison between low-temperature and room-temperature Mössbauer spectra demonstrated that the precursor is paramagnetic, whereas the heat-treated (500 °C) sample has a component that shows superparamagnet relaxation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: