Key result
A 5-minute suprasystolic upper-arm cuff occlusion resulted in a significantly greater flow-mediated slowing of pulse wave velocity compared to a 3-minute occlusion, while cardiovascular risk factors delayed recovery.
Why the study?
Does a 5-minute suprasystolic occlusion compared to a 3-minute occlusion improve the assessment of flow-mediated slowing of pulse wave velocity in a community-based sample?
Cross-Sectional (n=71)
No
Does a 5-minute suprasystolic occlusion compared to a 3-minute occlusion improve the assessment of flow-mediated slowing of pulse wave velocity in a community-based sample?
Effect estimate: -1.83% to -9.63%
p-value: p=≤0.037
A 5-minute occlusion time is superior to a 3-minute occlusion time for assessing vasomotor function via flow-mediated slowing of pulse wave velocity, which is delayed in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.
Background: Recent studies proposed that deceleration in pulse wave velocity (PWV) following reactive hyperaemia might reflect arterial distensibility and endothelial function.We therefore investigated methodological aspects and clinical determinants of new indexes of flow-mediated slowing (FMS) of PWV in a community-based sample.Methods: In 71 subjects (mean age, 60.3 years; 50.7% women), we continuously assessed brachial-radial PWV using Vicorder â at baseline and after 3-min or 5-min suprasystolic upper-arm cuff occlusion.We calculated the relative change (D) in PWV per each 30 s intervals during 4 min of post-occlusion.We performed stepwise regression analyses to assess determinants of the PWV response.Results: The peak FMS was detected at the first PWV recording obtained after occlusion.Overall, the decline in PWV during hyperaemia was significantly greater after 5-min of occlusion as compared to 3-min (effect sizes for 0e240 s intervals: À1.83% to À9.63%; P 0.037).PWV declined significantly less with higher age during the 0e60 s post-occlusion intervals (P 0.0053).On the other hand, after 120 s of post-occlusion, DPWV remained significantly lower in subjects with high diastolic blood pressure and oxidized LDL, and in smokers (P 0.028).Consequently, as compared to healthy reference group, participants with cardiovascular risk factors exhibited a delay in age-adjusted recovery of PWV after 5-min of occlusion (P 0.039).Conclusions: Our findings confirm the use of a 5-min occlusion time for the assessment of vasomotor function by FMS.Whereas the early FMS response might deteriorate with ageing,
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cauwenberghs et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in General population (n=71). 5-minute suprasystolic upper-arm cuff occlusion vs. 3-minute suprasystolic upper-arm cuff occlusion was evaluated on Relative change in brachial-radial pulse wave velocity (flow-mediated slowing) during 0-240 seconds post-occlusion (-1.83% to -9.63%, p=≤0.037). A 5-minute suprasystolic upper-arm cuff occlusion resulted in a significantly greater flow-mediated slowing of pulse wave velocity compared to a 3-minute occlusion, while cardiovascular risk factors delayed recovery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: