Optimal repetition time for free breathing myocardial arterial spin labeling

Arterial spin labeling (ASL) offers a noninvasive and repeatable measurement of tissue blood flow, but its application in the human heart is still challenging. The aim of this study was to improve the scan efficiency of flow‐sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) ASL using a single inversion time. First, by evaluating a free breathing acquisition without navigators. Second, by shortening TR to acquire more ASL pairs. A FAIR ASL with balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) readout was implemented at 3 T and tested in 14 healthy volunteers. Three cardiac‐triggered ASL scans with different TRs were compared while maintaining a constant acquisition time. These scans were named by the trigger pulse (TP) that started each acquisition: every two (TP1), four (TP2) and six (TP3) cardiac cycles. Two studies were performed on different days to assess the reproducibility of TP2 and TP3 scans. Perfusion response during passive leg raising was also evaluated. Student t‐test and nonparametric equivalent were computed for perfusion differences. Bland–Altman and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated for the reproducibility assessment. Mean myocardial blood flow (MBF) values measured at rest were: 1.47 ± 0.91 ml/g/min (TP1), 1.95 ± 0.93 ml/g/min (TP2) and 1.94 ± 1.41 ml/g/min (TP3). Intrasession CV was 17.15% (TP2) and 24.17% (TP3) and intersession CV was 36.86% (TP2) and 18.38% (TP3). Mean MBF was found to increase with passive stress by 0.22 ± 0.41 ml/g/min for TP2 ( P = 0.037). Mean MBF values were consistent with the literature, although in the high end of the normal range. The lower MBF values measured in TP1 scans are attributable to saturation of blood outside the slice because of shorter TR. Free breathing FAIR cardiac ASL without navigators is feasible. A TR of approximately four seconds (TP2) offers the best alternative with similar mean ASL and tSNR than longer TR acquisitions.