Key result
Biatrial pacing improved left atrial contractility (P≤0.03) and yielded the shortest delay to peak a-wave (P≤0.001) compared with pacing from the right atrial appendage.
Why the study?
Does multisite or biatrial pacing improve atrial hemodynamics and atrioventricular timing compared with right atrial appendage pacing in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Population
24 patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Comparison
Pacing from the high interatrial septum, distal… vs Pacing from the right atrial appendage and sinus…
Design
Other
Follow-up
acute (during procedure)
Authors
Loading...
May not yet change pacing site selection in paroxysmal AF; leaves open whether acute gains improve long-term outcomes.
Does multisite or biatrial pacing improve atrial hemodynamics and atrioventricular timing compared with right atrial appendage pacing in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
p-value: p=≤0.03
Biatrial pacing acutely improves left atrial contractility and atrioventricular synchrony compared to right atrial appendage pacing.
Burri et al. (2011) studied paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=24). Biatrial pacing vs. Pacing from the right atrial appendage was evaluated on Left atrial contractility (+dP/dT(max)) (p=≤0.03). Biatrial pacing improved left atrial contractility (P≤0.03) and yielded the shortest delay to peak a-wave (P≤0.001) compared with pacing from the right atrial appendage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: