Key result
Ralinepag reduced pulmonary vascular resistance compared with placebo in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (least-squares mean change -29.8% vs placebo; p=0.03).
Why the study?
The study was designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of immediate-release oral ralinepag compared with placebo in adults with symptomatic PAH receiving standard background therapy.
Does ralinepag reduce pulmonary vascular resistance in adult patients with symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension on background therapy?
RCT (n=61)
2:1
Does ralinepag reduce pulmonary vascular resistance in adult patients with symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension on background therapy?
p-value: p=0.02
In patients with symptomatic PAH, the addition of ralinepag to mono or dual background therapy significantly reduced pulmonary vascular resistance compared to placebo.
Supports ralinepag addition to background therapy in symptomatic PAH; extends prostacyclin pathway evidence from RCT.
PURPOSE: This phase 2 study was designed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of immediate-release orally administered ralinepag, a selective, non-prostanoid prostacyclin receptor agonist with a 24-h terminal half-life, compared to placebo in adult patients with symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). METHODS: 61 PAH patients who were receiving standard care, including mono or dual PAH-targeted background therapy were randomised 2:1 to ralinepag (n=40) or placebo (n=21). The starting dose of ralinepag was 10 μg twice daily. Dosage was then up-titrated as tolerated over the course of the 9-week dose-titration period, to a maximum total daily dose of 600 μg (300 μg twice daily). The primary efficacy end-point was the absolute change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) from baseline to week 22. Additional end-points included percentage change in PVR from baseline, other haemodynamic parameters, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: with placebo (p=0.02); the least-squares mean change from baseline PVR was -29.8% compared with placebo (p=0.03). 6MWD increased from baseline by 36.2 m with ralinepag and 29.4 m with placebo (p=0.90). Serious adverse events occurred in 10% of ralinepag patients and 29% of placebo patients. Study discontinuations occurred in 13% of ralinepag patients and 10% of placebo patients. SUMMARY: Ralinepag reduced PVR compared with placebo in PAH patients on mono (41%) or dual combination (59%) background therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torres et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (n=61). ralinepag vs. placebo was evaluated on absolute change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) from baseline to week 22 (p=0.02). Ralinepag reduced pulmonary vascular resistance compared with placebo in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (least-squares mean change -29.8% vs placebo; p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: