Key result
Ralinepag demonstrated dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and was generally well tolerated, with twice-daily dosing producing minimal steady-state peak-to-trough fluctuation.
Why the study?
Ralinepag is an oral, potent, and selective prostacyclin receptor agonist being developed for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
What are the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of oral ralinepag in healthy volunteers?
RCT (n=82)
Double-blind
3:1, 2:1, and 4:1
No
What are the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of oral ralinepag in healthy volunteers?
Oral immediate-release ralinepag showed favorable pharmacokinetics and expected safety profiles in healthy volunteers, supporting further development of an extended-release formulation for pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Supports advancement to efficacy trials; leaves open long-term safety and clinical benefit.
Ralinepag (APD811), an oral, potent, and selective prostacyclin receptor (IP) agonist is being developed for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Two, single‐center, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, Phase 1 studies (single ascending dose and multiple ascending dose) evaluated an oral immediate‐release capsule formulation of ralinepag in healthy subjects. Blood samples assessed plasma pharmacokinetics and safety and tolerability data monitored adverse events, vital signs, laboratory findings, physical examination, and electrocardiograms. Eighty‐two healthy subjects (single ascending dose (n = 32) and multiple ascending dose (n = 50)) completed the studies. No clinically significant safety issues were observed, except one serious adverse event of atrial fibrillation considered moderate in intensity. In the single ascending dose study, ralinepag was tolerated up to 100 µg (single dose), but not 200 µg due to nausea and vomiting. Dose proportional mean ralinepag plasma exposure measures were observed. Maximum plasma concentrations were reached within 1.0–1.5 h post‐dose and mean terminal elimination half‐life values from 20.5–26.4 h. In the multiple ascending dose study, ralinepag tolerability decreased with increasing QD or BID dose. Dose proportional steady‐state plasma exposure measures were observed where evaluable, with mean steady‐state peak‐to‐trough ratios ranging from 3.34–4.49 (QD dosing) and 1.95–2.36 (BID dosing). Mean effective half‐life values ranged from 17.5–18.4 h, reflecting ∼1.7‐fold (QD dosing) and ∼2.6‐fold (BID dosing) accumulation in plasma exposure. Safety and tolerability of oral immediate‐release ralinepag was generally consistent with expectations for this drug class, but more individualized dose escalation appears warranted. Ralinepag exhibited favorable pharmacokinetic properties, with BID dosing producing desired minimal steady‐state peak‐to‐trough fluctuation. Overall, results supported further clinical investigation of ralinepag and guided development of an extended‐release formulation to facilitate QD dosing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grundy et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers (n=82). Ralinepag vs. Placebo was evaluated on Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. Ralinepag demonstrated dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and was generally well tolerated, with twice-daily dosing producing minimal steady-state peak-to-trough fluctuation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: