Key result
Non-ischaemic aetiology (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.15-3.30), female sex, and LVEDD <60 mm were independent predictors of developing HFimpEF, which occurred in 19.5% of HFrEF patients at 1 year.
Why the study?
The study aimed to assess the incidence and predictive factors of developing heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) over 1 year in outpatients with HFrEF.
Observational (n=833)
Yes
In a real-world HFrEF cohort, nearly 20% of patients improved their ejection fraction to the HFimpEF category within 1 year, with higher likelihood in females, non-ischemic etiology, and smaller baseline LV dimensions.
May inform risk stratification in HFrEF clinics; leaves open need for prospective validation of predictors.
AIMS: The aim of the study was to assess the incidence and predictive factors of the development of heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) category during a 1 year follow-up period in a heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patient population managed in a heart failure outpatient clinic. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study evaluated data from patients enrolled in the Hungarian Heart Failure Registry (HHFR). The incidence and predictive factors of the development of the HFimpEF category after 1 year follow-up were assessed in the group of patients who had HFrEF at baseline. We evaluated the incidence and predictors of the development of HFimpEF after a 1 year follow-up in relation to time since diagnosis of HFrEF in patients diagnosed within 3 months, between 3 months and 1 year, and beyond 1 year. The predictive factors of the development of HFimpEF were analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Of the 833 HFrEF patients enrolled in the HHFR, the development of HFimpEF was observed in 162 patients (19.5%) during 1 year follow-up. In the whole patient population, independent predictors of the development of HFimpEF were female gender [odds ratio (OR): 1.73; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-2.96; P < 0.05], non-ischaemic aetiology (OR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.15-3.30; P < 0.05), and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) <60 mm (OR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.18-3.51; P < 0.05). The 1 year incidence of HFimpEF decreased in relation to time since diagnosis of HFrEF. The incidence of HFimpEF was 27.1% in patients diagnosed within 3 months, 18.4% in patients diagnosed between 3 months and 1 year, and 12.2% in patients diagnosed beyond 1 year. Non-ischaemic aetiology (OR: 4.76; 95% CI: 1.83-12.4; P < 0.01) and QRS width (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.71-0.94; P < 0.01) for patients diagnosed within 3 months, LVEDD (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.32-0.90; P < 0.05) and left atrial diameter ≤45 mm (OR: 5.44; 95% CI: 1.45-20.4; P < 0.05) for patients diagnosed between 3 months and 1 year, and LVEDD < 67 mm (OR: 2.71; 95% CI: 1.07-6.88; P < 0.05) for patients diagnosed beyond 1 year were found to be independent predictive factors. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, in this HFrEF patient population managed in a heart failure outpatient clinic, the 1 year incidence of HFimpEF was found to be ~20%. The 1 year incidence of HFimpEF decreased in relation to time since diagnosis of HFrEF. The most important predictors of the development of HFimpEF were female sex, non-ischaemic aetiology, narrower QRS width, and smaller diameter of the left ventricle and left atrium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solymossi et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=833). Non-ischaemic aetiology vs. Ischaemic aetiology was evaluated on Development of heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.15-3.30, p=<0.05). Non-ischaemic aetiology (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.15-3.30), female sex, and LVEDD <60 mm were independent predictors of developing HFimpEF, which occurred in 19.5% of HFrEF patients at 1 year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: