Key result
Among 2,183 participants (6.8% event rate), central hemodynamics derived via radial artery tonometry were not predictive of major CVD events beyond standard risk factors (P=0.20 for central SBP).
Why the study?
Do central hemodynamics derived from radial artery tonometry predict first-onset major CVD events beyond standard risk factors including brachial SBP?
Population
2183 participants in the Framingham Heart Study, mean age 62 years, 58% women.
Comparison
Central hemodynamics evaluated using radial… vs Standard risk factors including brachial cuff…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
median 7.8 (limits 0.2-8.9) years
Authors
Loading...
Central hemodynamics via tonometry should not guide CVD risk stratification; leaves open value in other cohorts or refined models.
Cohort (n=2,183)
Do central hemodynamics derived from radial artery tonometry predict first-onset major CVD events beyond standard risk factors including brachial SBP?
p-value: p=0.20
Central hemodynamics derived from radial artery tonometry and a generalized transfer function do not improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction beyond standard risk factors including brachial systolic blood pressure.
Mitchell et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (n=2,183). Central hemodynamics derived using radial artery tonometry vs. Standard risk factors including brachial cuff SBP was evaluated on First-onset major CVD events (p=0.20). Among 2,183 participants (6.8% event rate), central hemodynamics derived via radial artery tonometry were not predictive of major CVD events beyond standard risk factors (P=0.20 for central SBP).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: