Why the study?
Does autogenic-feedback training increase blood pressure in individuals preparing for aerospace flight to prevent orthostatic intolerance?
Does autogenic-feedback training increase blood pressure in individuals preparing for aerospace flight to prevent orthostatic intolerance?
Autogenic-feedback training enabled subjects to voluntarily increase their blood pressure by 20 to 50 mm Hg, demonstrating feasibility as a potential countermeasure for postflight orthostatic intolerance.
Hypothesis-generating for autogenic training in aerospace; larger trials needed before any clinical adoption.
Postflight orthostatic intolerance has been identified as a serious biomedical problem associated with long-duration exposure to microgravity in space. High priority has been given to the development of countermeasures for this disorder that are both effective and practical. A considerable body of clinical research has demonstrated that people can be taught to increase their own blood pressure voluntarily, and that this is an effective treatment for chronic orthostatic intolerance in paralyzed patients. The current pilot study was designed to examine the feasibility of adding training in control of blood pressure to an existing preflight training program designed to facilitate astronaut adaptation to microgravity. Using an operant conditioning procedure, autogenic-feedback training (AFT), three men and two women participated in four to nine training (15-30-minute) sessions. At the end of training, the average increase in systolic and diastolic pressure, as well as mean arterial pressures, that the subjects made ranged between 20 and 50 mm Hg under both supine and 45 degrees head-up tilt conditions. These findings indicate that AFT may be a useful alternative treatment or supplement to existing approaches for preventing postflight orthostatic intolerance. Furthermore, the use of operant conditioning methods for training cardiovascular responses may contribute to the general understanding of the mechanisms of orthostatic intolerance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cowings et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: