Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The author challenges the concept that hallucination is indistinguishable from perception. His view is that a mental image, such as that occurring in a hallucination, can be differentiated from a percept when perception takes place over a period of time. His theory is supported by the fact that during perception the percept is subject to tests for reality, for example, scanning and inspection with the eyes and by head, hand and body movements, whereas mental images are not subject to investigation or susceptible to increased clarity by any of these physical actions. Often persons having hallucinations or ‘psychedelic experiences’ feel that their mental images are no different from percepts because they fail to apply the necessary tests, owing to disinclination or passivity under the influence of disease or drugs. His theory also explains the experiences of daydreams and night dreams. He points out that artists have long known that a picture can ‘fool the eye’. But by using both eyes and by moving the head, the flat surface of the picture will always be revealed. L’auteur recuse le concept selon lequel l’hallucination ne peut se distinguer de la perception. Il part du point de vue qu’une image mentale, telle que celle provoquee par une hallucination, peut etre differenciee d’une image percue quand la perception dure un certain temps. Sa theorie est etayee par le fait que, durant le temps de la perception, la chose percue peut etre sujette a des tests prouvant sa realite, par exemple investigations et inspections aux moyens des yeux et de la tete, de la main et des mouvements du corps, tandis que les images mentales ne sont pas sujettes a l’investigation ou susceptibles d’etre plus clairement apprehendees au moyen de l’une quelconque de ces actions physiques. Souvent, des personnes, ayant des hallucinations ou des ‘experiences psychedeliques’ pretendent que leurs images mentales ne sont pas differentes des perceptions objectives, parce que, sous l’influence de la maladie ou des drogues, elles s’abstiennent, par negligence ou par passivite, d’y appliquer les tests necessaires. La theorie de l’auteur explique egalement les experiences de reve eveille et de reve nocturne. Il met en evidence que depuis longtemps, les artistes savent qu’une image peut ‘tromper l’œil’. Mais en se servant a la fois des yeux et en bougeant la tete, l’image apparaitra toujours comme une surface plane.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James J. Gibson (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: