Key result
Circulating endothelial cells provide important diagnostic and prognostic value regarding endothelium status and long-term outcomes of vascular dysfunction in chronic kidney disease.
Why the study?
Does the measurement of circulating endothelial cells provide diagnostic and prognostic value for endothelial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease?
Does the measurement of circulating endothelial cells provide diagnostic and prognostic value for endothelial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease?
Circulating endothelial cells represent a promising novel biomarker for assessing endothelial damage and predicting vascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease.
May support CEC measurement for endothelial assessment in CKD; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Endothelial dysfunction may play a crucial role in initiation of the pathogenesis of vascular disease and atherosclerosis. The identification and quantification of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) have been developed as a novel marker of endothelial function. We describe, in great detail, mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction and CEC detachment. We also review the relationship between numbers of CEC and disease severity and response to treatment. In addition, we describe the possible clinical use of CEC in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and kidney transplantation. In summary, CEC have been developed as a novel approach to assess the endothelial damage. Measurement of the CEC level would provide an important diagnostic and prognostic value on the endothelium status and the long-term outcome of vascular dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2014) conducted a review in Chronic Kidney Disease. Circulating endothelial cells (CEC) was evaluated. Circulating endothelial cells provide important diagnostic and prognostic value regarding endothelium status and long-term outcomes of vascular dysfunction in chronic kidney disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: