Why the study?
Does the combined evaluation of cardiac troponin-T, myoglobin, and creatine kinase MBmass improve early diagnosis and risk stratification in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction?
Does the combined evaluation of cardiac troponin-T, myoglobin, and creatine kinase MBmass improve early diagnosis and risk stratification in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction?
Combined analysis of cardiac biomarkers in the emergency department accurately identifies additional AMI patients and strongly stratifies 1-year risk of cardiac death or non-fatal AMI.
May aid risk stratification in suspected AMI; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective validation before practice change.
AIMS: The diagnostic and prognostic capacity of biochemical markers of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department were evaluated in consecutive patients (n=155) with suspected acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Serum myoglobin >/=110 microg. l(-1)and creatine kinase MB(mass)>/=5 microg. l(-1)had a high accuracy (0.77-0.85) (ns) for acute myocardial infarction diagnosis in patients presenting >2 h after symptom onset. Troponin-T (>/=0.10 microg. l(-1)) had a lower accuracy (0.53-0.70) for acute myocardial infarction diagnosis, but was the most important 1-year prognostic marker (cardiac death or non-fatal acute myocardial infarction). In patients without ST elevation, combined analysis of two biochemical tests would accurately identify an additional 20% of acute myocardial infarction patients (predictive value of a positive test=0.82) and also identify those without acute myocardial infarction (predictive value of a negative test=0.80). One-year event-free survival was excellent (96%) for patients with two negative biochemical tests, intermediate (74%) for those with discordant tests, and only 53% for patients with two positive biochemical tests. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of biochemical tests in the emergency department prior to hospital admission could accurately identify approximately 20% additional acute myocardial infarction patients. The prognosis of these patients is poor, and they may be a target for primary PTCA or new early initiated aggressive medical therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Birgit Jurlander (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: